Tessel Advisory64 engagements
Published
One figure, settled before the work starts and printed after it, whichever way it came out. That is the whole offer, and everything below is the arithmetic behind it.
Boards bring us the problem before it has a name. We answer it with Strategy & Growth, Operations & Performance, Digital & AI, Finance & Transformation, Risk, Governance & Regulation and People & Organisation.
Casework
Each one with the client named, the figure agreed at the start, and what it came to.
A copilot that reads the claim, proposes the route and shows its evidence: built with the claims team, handed to them in twelve weeks.
A model register with risk tiers, an audit trail from data to decision, and a policy set mapped to the regulation clause by clause.
A fixed maintenance calendar replaced by a schedule built on the machines' own readings, and argued with by the crews who run it.
Forty depots, two disagreeing forecasts, and a network resequenced around the hours the depots actually had.
The margin map showed that a fifth of the range was paying for the rest. The pricing was tested on the shelf before it went in a deck.
from the first audit to a handover the client runs on its own
to a partner’s reply, including when the answer is no
agreed before the work starts, and printed after it
where the money, the hours and the risk go
the answer, tested before it is built
the change, in production
your team runs it
engagements closed
since 2021, each with its outcome published or on request
still in place
a year after handover, of the 43 old enough to check
practitioners
senior, salaried, and no subcontractors
we argued against
audits whose first recommendation was something we do not sell
Two paragraphs about what is going wrong is the most useful first message. A partner reads it, and you hear back within two working days, including when the answer is that we are not the right firm for it.